Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Rajnish Rajnish v. David Jennings, et al
as 21-15569
Petitioner: RAJNISH RAJNISH
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, TONY H. PHAM, CHAD F. WOLF and others
John Doe v. Monty Wilkinson, et al
as 21-15257
Respondent: MONTY WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WENDELL ANDERSON, in his official capacity, Sheriff-Coroner of Yuba County in charge of Yuba County Jail and others
Petitioner: JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07819
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05864
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nak Chhoeun, et al v. David Marin, et al
as 20-55665
Petitioner: ANG THOEUN, SOKHAN KHIM, THELH KETH and others
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Field Office Director, Los Angeles Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID W. JENNINGS, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv03908
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03909
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lexis Hernandez Avilez v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16142
Respondent: WENDELL ANDERSON, in his official capacity, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity, DAVID W. JENNINGS and others
Petitioner: LEXIS HERNANDEZ AVILEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03058
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?