Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 70
MCKINNEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00941
Petitioner: DUANE MCKINNEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BERRY v. SESSIONS
as 1:2018cv00685
Petitioner: DUANE LETROY BERRY
Respondent: JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00539
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. SYNCOM VENTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02439
Plaintiff: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant: SYNCOM VENTURE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, MAKTUB CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT LLC, 55TH & STATE REDEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. HOLLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff: DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant: J.C. HOLLAND and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOOD v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02139
Defendant: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES , J. DAVID COX and NATHANIEL NELSON
Plaintiff: DUANE WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv01334
Plaintiff: THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Defendant: PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN M. MISCHO, DUANE MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESSLEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv01223
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: DUANE PRESSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ZHANG et al v. MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD et al
as 1:2016cv01048
Plaintiff: JIANGUO ZHANG, HUATIAN HU, JIN LIU and others
Defendant: MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD, MALYSIAN AIRLINES SYSTEM BERHAD, ALLLIANZ GLOBAL CORPORATE AND SPECIALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?