Cases 21 - 30 of 130
Whitehead v. Mahone et al
as 1:2010cv01027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Whitehead
Defendant:
Sylvia Mahone, Stephnie Hanes, Guy Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Harrington et al
as 3:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Scott
Defendant:
Richard Harrington, Roger E Walker, Eddie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00908
Plaintiff:
Donnie D White
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, James Blackard, Michael Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01345
Plaintiff:
Michael . Davis
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, David A Lingle, Lance R Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01298
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Eddie Jones, Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv03200
Plaintiff:
Lamont G Thomas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Randle, James Sledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv01221
Plaintiff:
Douglas James
Defendant:
Joseph Lewis, Joseph Lewis, McBurnie and others
Respondent:
Smithson and Smithson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Gilson et al
as 1:2009cv03195
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Kevin L. Gilson and Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Gilson et al
as 3:2009cv00382
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Kevill Gilson, Eddie Jones and IL Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suh v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Andrew P Suh, Andrew P Suh and Andrew P Suh
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
