Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nova Casualty Company v. Las Olas 825, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv61168
Plaintiff:
Nova Casualty Company
Defendant:
Las Olas 825, LLC, Shelby G. Smith, III, Shelby G Smith, III, Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2013cv00612
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SMITH v. TUCKER
as 3:2012cv00326
Petitioner:
DANA G SMITH
Respondent:
KENNETH S TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2012cv00937
Plaintiff:
Nancy G. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2012cv20431
Plaintiff:
Cecil G Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 5:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
PAMELA G SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
United States of America v. Tract C02-12 et al
as 2:2011cv00226
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tract C02-12 and Barnes G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al
as 8:2009cv01845
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant:
Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Altimas et al v. Whitney et al
as 2:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Altimas, Thomas L. Altimas, Lise Girard and others
Defendant:
Russell Whitney, Michael O. Kane, Kane Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
