Cases 21 - 30 of 1,359
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC. et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC., CARLOS EDUARDO PIMENTEL, KAREN GASPARETTO PIMENTEL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND and JACQUELINE WARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01287
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZHONG et al v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2024cv01136
Petitioner:
FEIFEI ZHONG and YILIAN LI
Respondent:
UR M. JADDOU, CORLISS A JOSEPHS-CONWAY and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
