Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Bowles v. VEREIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00845
Defendant:
Realty Income Corporation, Richard Lieb, Rams Acquisition Sub II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bowles
Kent v. PRA Health Sciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00757
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Colin Shannon, Alexander G. Dickinson, Matthew P. Young and others
Fusco v. Kellow et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Pasqualino Di Fusco
Defendant:
Michael W. Sutherlin, David J. Miller, Mark Spurbeck and others
Nominal Defendant:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00128
Nominal Defendant:
Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Welch, Daniel Bradbury, Paolo Fundaro and others
Plaintiff:
Pearl Fung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rabinovich v. Fundaro et al
as 1:2021cv00101
Defendant:
Daniel welch, Daniel Bradbury, Keith Gottesdiener and others
Plaintiff:
Delfin Rabinovich and Pearl Fung
Nominal Defendant:
Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Phelps v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01747
Defendant:
Michael W. Sutherlin, David J. Miller, Stephen E. Gorman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark Phelps
Kent v. Churchill Capital Corp III et al
as 1:2020cv01068
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Michael Klein, Jeremy Paul Abson, Mark Klein and others
Post v. Finjan Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00900
Defendant:
Finjan Holdings, Inc., Alex Rogers, John Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Post
Robinson et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2020cv00663
Plaintiff:
Joseph Palopoli, Jr., John Toda, Mariano Lorenzo Macaisa and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchi v. GAIN Capital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00519
Defendant:
Alex Goor, Christopher S. Sugden, Glenn H. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
