Cases 21 - 30 of 93
Ward v. Innosub USA et al
as 1:2019cv11100
Defendant:
Innosub USA, KISSMAX DESIGN COMPANY LIMITED, John Doe Corp. 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ward
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ujiie v. New Life Sushi, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10996
Plaintiff:
Shinji Ujiie
Defendant:
365 Seki, Inc., d/b/a Sushi Seki Times Square, New Life Sushi, Inc. d/b/a Sushi Seki Upper East Side, Zhong Shen Shi a/k/a Seki and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06917
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yang et al v. An Ju Home, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05616
Defendant:
Structure Enterprise, Inc., Hengjian Cui, Candice Colucci and others
Plaintiff:
Kezheng Zuo, Xiaojiang Zuo, Yongfu Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chen et al v. ABC Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv03294
Defendant:
ABC Corp. and Jimmy Chen
Plaintiff:
Hang Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzaga Cortes v. Lin et al
as 1:2019cv00905
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Gonzaga Cortes
Defendant:
Hang Lin, Saigon Cafe 89 Inc. and Qing Quan Zheng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Accardo et al v. Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11314
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Smith, Zulma Candelario, Norman Green and others
Defendant:
Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
Petitioner:
Darryl Adone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
