Cases 21 - 30 of 64
NICHOLS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91251
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL NICHOLS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GEORGE v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91289
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Plaintiff:
GREG D GEORGE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JASKY v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91309
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E JASKY
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAMILTON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91262
Plaintiff:
JAMES E HAMILTON
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WALLACE v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91263
Plaintiff:
WALTER A WALLACE
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOLEY et al v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91292
Plaintiff:
LEROY E COOLEY and CHICAGO PROTECTIVE APPAREL
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GARCIA v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91286
Plaintiff:
GUADALUPE G GARCIA
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEWIS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91291
Plaintiff:
ALBERTINE LEWIS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCGREW et al v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91266
Plaintiff:
LILIAN MCGREW and ANTONIO G GONZALEZ
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ELIAS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2008cv91275
Plaintiff:
MIKE ELIAS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
