Cases 21 - 30 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv07618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Samvel Hakobyan v. Michael Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv07620
Plaintiff:
Samvel Hakobyan
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv07025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sandra P. Vela v. Michael B. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv03641
Defendant:
Jane E. Arellano, Michael Chertoff and Michael B. Mukasey
Plaintiff:
Sandra P. Vela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04621
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Darlene G. Decena v. Jonathan Scharfen et al
as 2:2008cv04496
Plaintiff:
Darlene G. Decena
Defendant:
Jonathan Scharfen, Jane E. Arellano, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
