Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Steve Sisolak, Aaron Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Entsminger v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gregory West Entsminger
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Olivia Agle, Russ Alfano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00277
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Nurse Sean, John Keast and others
Plaintiff:
Terry James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Entsminger v. Michael Minev, et al
as 20-16170
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER LINK, MICHELLE WHITE, in official capacity, SONYA EDDINGS and others
Defendant:
PAULINE SIMMONS, KATHY DECARLO, UNKNOWN, Caroline and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY WEST ENTSMINGER
Hermanson v. Keast et al
as 3:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Naughton, John Keast and Minev
Plaintiff:
James E. Hermanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Naughton et al
as 3:2020cv00224
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Naughton, "URP" Utilization Review, John Keast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broomfield v. Keast et al
as 3:2019cv00743
Defendant:
D. Richards, John Keast and Michael Minen
Plaintiff:
Steven City Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 19-16794
Defendant / Appellee:
HICK-MOSES, W. MILLER, Sgt., ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Schenker v. Adamson et al
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Utilization Review Panel, Kim Adamson, Home Town Health Care and others
Plaintiff:
Karl W. Schenker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Follett v. Aranas et al
as 3:2019cv00421
Defendant:
Karen Knoll, Theresa Wickham, Sunshine Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Sean David Follett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
