Cases 21 - 30 of 38
HOLT et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv79800
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. HOLT and BETTYE JEAN HOLT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOLT et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv79801
Plaintiff:
NORMAN R. HOLT and BETTYE JEAN HOLT
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD, ARMSTRONG WORLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BILLUPS v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84938
Plaintiff:
JAMES BILLUPS
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROOKS v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84940
Plaintiff:
EDDIE BROOKS
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BOUTWELL v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84943
Plaintiff:
BONNIE BOUTWELL
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDREWS v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84932
Plaintiff:
MAJOR ANDREWS, JR.
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BERNAUER v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84936
Plaintiff:
FRANK BERNAUER
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BUCKELEW v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84945
Plaintiff:
JUROLENE BUCKELEW
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDERSON v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84931
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ANDERSON
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BREEDEN v. AC&S et al
as 2:2008cv84944
Plaintiff:
JAMES BREEDEN
Defendant:
AC&S, CHRISTIAN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, LAUREL MACHINERY AND FOUNDRY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
