Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Hogue v. Yordy et al
as 1:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Brian E Hogue
Defendant:
Keith Yordy, Kevin Kempf and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andoe v. Kempf et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Andoe
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Randy Blades, Henry Atencio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elias Custodio v. Sonnier, et al
as 16-35871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIAS MANUEL CUSTODIO
Defendant - Appellee:
SONNIER, Counselor - Facilitator of the Theraputic Community program ICC, SAADE, Mrs - Grievance Coordinator ICC/CCA and KEVIN KEMPF
John and Jane Does 1-104 v. Wasden et al
as 1:2016cv00429
Defendant:
Lawrence Wasden, Kevin Kempf, Terry Kirkham and others
Plaintiff:
John and Jane Does 1-104
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hogan v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
James Hogan
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Debra Field, David McClusky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Workman et al v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Workman and Ray Marvin Nichols
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Corizon Medical Services, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dick v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dick
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Sheriff of Canyon County, Sheriff of Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00236
Petitioner:
Donald V Baker
Respondent:
Idaho Department of Corrections and Kevin Kempf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sailor v. Blades et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Evert Sailor
Defendant:
Randy Blades, Grant Roberts, Collin Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
