Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Central Florida Liquidation and Sales, LLC et al v. Evo Payments International, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04507
Plaintiff:
Central Florida Liquidation and Sales, LLC and L & M Enterprises USA, LLC
Defendant:
Evo Merchant Services, LLC and Evo Payments International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coraza et al v. L&M Cleaners on York, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Silvia Coraza , Isodoro Roberto Martinez and Armando Vidal
Defendant:
L&M Cleaners on York, Inc. and Larry Harwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
L&M Direct LLC v. Aldo Group Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07020
Plaintiff:
L&M Direct LLC
Defendant:
Aldo Group Inc. , J.C. Penny Corporation, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
L&M Companies, Inc. v. GNS Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05038
Plaintiff:
L&M Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
GNS Produce, Inc., Sergey Nashonov and Michael Nashonov
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv04274
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Velasquez v. L&M Cleaners on York Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02128
Plaintiff:
Jovita Velasquez
Defendant:
L&M Cleaners on York Inc. and Larry Harwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05422
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
