Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 116
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp. America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03210
Plaintiff: Rosemary Valdez
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Paguirigan et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03216
Plaintiff: Jai Paguirigan and Amy Paguirigan
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bly v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al
as 3:2007cv03158
Plaintiff: Rebecca Bly
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Co., LTD., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
DiMatteo v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al
as 3:2007cv03072
Plaintiff: Tom DiMatteo
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Co., LTD., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Juan v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03076
Plaintiff: Jose Juan, Jose Juan, Jose Juan and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Ronco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03078
Plaintiff: Patricia Ronco
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Diplomat Merchandise Corp. v. LG Philips LCD Co., LTD. et al
as 3:2007cv03077
Plaintiff: Diplomat Merchandise Corp., Diplomat Merchandise Corp. and Diplomat Merchandise Corp.
Defendant: LG Philips LCD Co., LTD., LG Philips LCD America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03079
Plaintiff: John Martich and John Martich
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ajax Philadelphia, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03083
Plaintiff: Ajax Philadelphia, Inc.
Defendant: Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Kelley v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03082
Plaintiff: Allen Kelley
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?