Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,484
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01559
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
MASON CAPITAL L.P. et al v. REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2024cv01551
Petitioner: MASON CAPITAL L.P. and MASON MANAGEMENT LLC
Respondent: REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01525
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. et al v. FLAT LINE CAPITAL LLC
as 1:2024mc00067
Plaintiff: JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC, JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC. and others
Defendant: FLAT LINE CAPITAL LLC & KEVIN BARNES
HAMLET HMA LLC v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01455
Plaintiff: HAMLET HMA LLC doing business as SANDHILLS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
HAMLET HMA LLC
as 1:2024cv01454
Plaintiff: HAMLET HMA LLC doing business as SANDHILLS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01476
Plaintiff: COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA, USC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL, USC ARCADIA HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MAPP, LLC. v. S & C MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC.
as 1:2024cv01453
Petitioner: MAPP, LLC
Respondent: S & C MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?