Cases 21 - 30 of 30
NOT USED
as 3:2009cv00743
Plaintiff:
Alex Fayer
Defendant:
Mirage Casino-Hotel, State of Nevada, ex rel Nevada Gaming Control Board, Enforcement Division and Arthur Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Magadia v. Mirage Casino Hotel
as 2:2008cv01780
Plaintiff:
Raul Magadia, Raul Magadia, Raul Magadia and others
Defendant:
Mirage Casino Hotel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Mirage Casino-Hotel v. Hopp
as 2:2008cv01083
Plaintiff:
The Mirage Casino-Hotel
Defendant:
Dennis Hopp
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bellagio, LLC, et al v. Horaney
as 08-15413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BELLAGIO, LLC, MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC and MIRAGE CASINO-HOTEL
Defendant - Appellant:
SHIBLEY H. HORANEY
Bellagio, LLC, et al v. Horaney, et al
as 08-15412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BELLAGIO, LLC, MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC and MIRAGE CASINO-HOTEL
Defendant - Appellant:
SHIBLEY H. HORANEY
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
ALLEN HYMAN
Mandalay Corp.,et al v. Cho
as 2:2007cv01722
Defendant:
Phillip Cho
Plaintiff:
Mandalay Corp., Mandalay Corp., Mandalay Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Bellagio, LLC et al v. Classic Vegas Weddings, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv01247
Plaintiff:
Bellagio, LLC, Bellagio, LLC, The Mirage Casino-Hotel and others
Defendant:
Classic Vegas Weddings, LLC and Shawn Jewell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bellagio, LLC et al v. A Las Vegas Garden Of Love et al
as 2:2007cv00942
Plaintiff:
Bellagio, LLC, Bellagio, LLC, Bellagio, LLC and others
Defendant:
A Las Vegas Garden Of Love, Cheryl Luell and Craig Luell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
