Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00460
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00232
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00158
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 ( Petition for Naturalization Hearing Before District Court)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00098
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lu v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
Yi Lu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Mary Mischke and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 ( Petition for Naturalization Hearing Before District Court)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pechkov v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2007cv02392
Plaintiff:
Anatoli Pechkov
Defendant:
Michael Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 ( Petition for Naturalization Hearing Before District Court)
Huang et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv02348
Plaintiff:
Jianchun Huang Huang, Xin Deng and Jing Huang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
