Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Enrique Barrios v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv06233
Defendant:
ABC CORPS. (1-10), Robert Arum, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Barrios
Devarious Craig v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv06234
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Home Box Office Inc, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Devarious Craig and Kristina Darden
In Re:Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
as 2:2015ml02639
In Re:
Pacquiao-Mayweather Boxing Match Pay-Per-View Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden, John Assalian, Enrique Barrios and others
Petitioner:
Showtime Networks Inc., Attorney Edgardo Lopez, Mr. Maximino Lopez and others
Defendant:
Floyd Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions LLC, EMMANUEL D. PACQUAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TERRENCE JACKSON v. EMMANUEL PACQUIAO et al
as 2:2015cv06226
Defendant:
ABC CORPS. (1-10), Robert Arum, Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Jackson
Robert Neidl v. Top Rank, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2015cv06230
Plaintiff:
Robert Neidl and Greg Hoevener
Defendant:
Top Rank Inc, Mayweather Promotions, LLC, Robert Arum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Maximo Lopez et al v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04435
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Does, Michael Koncz and others
Plaintiff:
Maximino Lopez and Andy Roxas
Jammers, Inc. v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03493
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Does, Todd DuBoef and others
Plaintiff:
Jammers, Inc.
Constantino v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nick Constantino
Defendant:
Top Rank, Inc., Robert Arum, Todd Duboef and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeremy Tjaden v. Top Rank, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03419
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Does, Todd Duboef and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Tjaden
Paul Mahoney v. Emmanuel Pacquiao et al
as 2:2015cv03376
Defendant:
Robert Arum, Does, Todd DuBoef and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Mahoney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
