Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Southern Baptist Theological, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4033
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY and ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health and MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Emanuel McCray, et al v. OSHA
as 22-3009
Petitioner:
EMANUEL MCCRAY, As an Individual Employee and as an Independent Contractor to Amazon Logistics, Inc. and GOD LOVES YOU, INC.
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Douglas Martin v. OSHA
as 21-3284
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS P. MARTIN
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Scott Bedke, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4157
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
SCOTT BEDKE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate and SIXTY-SIXTH IDAHO LEGISLATURE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, JAMES FREDERICK and others
Amicus Curiae:
TEXANS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT and DADE PHELAN, Texas Speaker of the House
N.A. Building Trades Unions v. OSHA
as 21-4152
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY, TEXANS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT and others
Heritage Foundation v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4149
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Respondent:
DOUGLAS L. PARKER, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARTIN J. WALSH
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, OHIO AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION, OHIO WHOLESALE BEER AND WINE ASSOCIATION and others
North America's Building Trades Unions v. OSHA, et al
as 21-1250
Petitioner:
North America's Building Trades Unions
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration and Secretary of Labor
Aaron Abadi v. OSHA
as 21-4133
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
AARON ABADI
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
The Heritage Foundation v. Douglas Parker, et al
as 21-1247
Petitioner:
The Heritage Foundation
Respondent:
Douglas Parker, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
