Cases 21 - 30 of 1,086
Colvin v. Sharkninja Operating, LLC
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
SYDNEY COLVIN
Defendant:
SHARKNINJA OPERATING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KIMBROUGH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Elnora Kimbrough
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perez v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 0:2024cv60371
Plaintiff:
Corina Perez
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk US Commercial Holdings, Inc., Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. Cajun Operating Company, Inc
as 1:2024cv20781
Plaintiff:
Willie Johnson
Defendant:
Cajun Operating Company, Inc. d/b/a Church's Restaurant and Cajun Operating Company, Inc doing business as Church's Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
