Cases 21 - 30 of 31
The Mississippi Bar v. Knight
as 3:2020ad00008
Respondent:
Jeffrey Dixon Knight
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. King
as 3:2020ad00007
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ralph P. King, II
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2020ad00006
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Richard Vaughn Johnson, Jr.
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2020ad00005
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Walker
as 3:2020ad00004
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Randolph Walker
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Mauk-Williams
as 3:2020ad00003
Respondent:
Charlene Mauk-Williams
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Abioto
as 3:2020ad00002
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Wanda X. Abioto
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Cotton
as 3:2020ad00001
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ramel L. Cotton
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Roberson v. Green et al
as 1:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Perry Roberson
Defendant:
Patricia Green and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walton et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
Barbara Walton, All Plaintiffs, William Dillard and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
