Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 287
Storm v. McClusky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00214
Defendant: Campbell, Board of Corrections, Ross Caselton and others
Plaintiff: Rickie Storm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Fletcher v. Randy Blades
as 19-35396
Petitioner / Appellant: WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER
Respondent / Appellee: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Hodge v. Epps et al
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant: Shelby Epps, Randy Blades, Mark Way and others
Plaintiff: Robert M Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faron Hawkins v. Gary Raney, et al
as 19-35325
Petitioner / Appellant: FARON RAYMOND HAWKINS
Respondent: RANDY BLADES, Warden, KEITH YORDY, Warden, ROGER BOURNE, Ada County Prosecutor and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAY CHRISTENSEN, Custodian and GARY RANEY, Ada County Sheriff
Glen Ward v. State of Idaho, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35279
Defendant / Appellee: GRAHAM, ALEXANDER NESHIKOFF, ROBBINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GLEN JONES WARD
Michael Alfaro v. Randy Blades
as 19-35072
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL ALFARO
Respondent / Appellee: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Drennon v. Blades et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00021
Defendant: Idaho Commission of Pardons & Parole, Angel Dobrev, Randy Blades and others
Plaintiff: Richard J Drennon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant: Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff: Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blade
as 18-35643
Petitioner - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY BLADES, Warden
Zach Wall v. Idaho Commission for Pardons, et al
as 18-35625
Plaintiff - Appellant: ZACH RYAN WALL
Defendant - Appellee: IDAHO COMMISSION FOR PARDONS & PAROLE and RANDY BLADES, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?