Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv06322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv06586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carter et al v. HealthPort Technologies, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv06275
Plaintiff:
Marissa Carter , Evelyn Grys , Bruce Currier and others
Defendant:
HealthPort Technologies, LLC , The Rochester General Hospital, The Unity Hospital of Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McPhail v. Rochester General Hospital et al
as 6:2014cv06071
Plaintiff:
Elwell McPhail
Defendant:
Rochester General Hospital, Brian Shonitsky, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv06386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv06648
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Monroe County Department of Health, Industrial Medicine Association, Strong Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00961
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM , ACCORD MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LP , ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
