Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Meyer et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02496
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyer and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Decrona v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02301
Plaintiff:
Cathy Decrona
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bath v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 4:2013cv03690
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Bath
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chao, M.D. et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
David Chao, M.D. , Oasis MSO Inc. and David J. Chao, MD, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. , Smith & Nephew, PLC and Does 1 thru 10
Miscellaneous_party:
Marc O Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Salinas v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2012cv03102
Plaintiff:
Roland Salinas
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herron, Jr. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, et al.
as 2:2012cv03052
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Permanente Medical Group and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Herron, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herron, Jr. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2012at01617
Plaintiff:
Paul Herron, Jr.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Reilly et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02220
Plaintiff:
William Reilly and Jill Reilly
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2011cv01014
Plaintiff:
Loren Henry
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thoele v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01807
Plaintiff:
Gwen Thoele
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Matthew Bouza and Projoint Medical, Inc. doing business as Smith & Nephew Orthopedic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.