Cases 21 - 29 of 29
White Stallion Energy Center, et al v. EPA
as 12-1272
Intervenor:
John William Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, State of Utah, Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition and others
Amicus Curiae:
Wasatch Integrated Waste Management District, York County Solid Waste and Refuse Authority, City and County of Honolulu and others
Petitioner:
Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, White Stallion Energy Center, LLC, Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
White Stallion Energy Center v. EPA
as 12-1100
Intervenor:
Chase Power Development, LLC, American Public Health Association, State of North Carolina and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Chest Physicians, Richard J. Lazarus, Oliver A. Houck and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
White Stallion Energy Center, LLC
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. EPA
as 09-1135
Petitioner:
National Wildlife Federation, Indiana Wildlife Federation, League of Ohio Sportsmen and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
National Wildlife Federation, et al v. EPA
as 09-3245
Petitioner:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INDIANA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, LEAGUE OF OHIO SPORTSMEN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Sierra Club v. EPA
as 09-1018
Petitioner:
Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council and Environmental Defense Fund
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Indiana Wildlife Federation, Michigan Environmental Council and Ohio Environmental Council
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Utility Air Regulatory Group, Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2008cv02198
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC., CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
STEPHEN L. JOHNSON and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
State of North Carolina v. EPA
as 05-1244
Petitioner:
State of North Carolina
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Utility Air Regulatory Group, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Environmental Council and others
Intervenor:
National Mining Association and Alabama Power Company
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Connecticut and State of New Jersey
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Massachusetts and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Ohio
St NY, et al v. EPA
as 02-1387
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Maine and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
NSR Manufacturers Roundtable, Clean Air Implementation Project, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
American Petroleum Institute, Utility Air Regulatory Group, Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and others
Terminated Party:
National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Regulatory Project
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Clean Air Trust, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jon S. Corzine and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Florida
Amicus Curiae:
James M. Inhofe
Amer Corn Growers v. EPA
as 99-1348
Petitioner:
American Corn Growers Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner:
State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality
Intervenor:
Clean Air Implementation Project, Center for Energy and Economic Development and Western Fuels Association, Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent:
National Tribal Environmental Council, State of New Hampshire, Appalachian Mountain Club and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
State of Utah, State of Washington, Department of Ecology and New Mexico Environment Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
