Cases 21 - 30 of 12,527
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1416
Petitioner:
GURPREET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kansas, State of et al v. United States Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kansas, State of, Arkansas, State of, Iowa, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Ohio, State of
Amicus Curiae:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, March for Our Lives, Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Reyes-Galvez v. Garland
as 24-1381
Petitioner:
ANA MARINA REYES-GALVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Xiao-Chao v. Garland
as 24-1408
Petitioner:
ZHUO XIAO-CHAO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera-Reino v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL MAURICIO RIVERA-REINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sikder v. Garland
as 24-1362
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LOKMAN SIKDER, FARJANA AKTER, MOHAMMED SAFWAN SIKDER and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Cecias v. Garland
as 24-1367
Petitioner:
DONNY ANDRE RODRIGUEZ-CECIAS, KARLA STEPHANIE MIRANDA-MANRIQUE and EITHAN SEBASTIAN RODRIGUEZ-MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hu v. Garland
as 24-1370
Petitioner:
CHANG BING HU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chicas-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-1374
Petitioner:
DENIA ISABEL CHICAS-MARTINEZ and CESIA MARIA VILLATORO-CHICAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
