Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Davidson Land Company LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2010cv00064
Plaintiff:
Davidson Land Company LLC
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wilson v Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2010cv00027
Plaintiff:
Amanda D Wilson and Amanda D Wilson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Roberts vs Union Pacific
as 2:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Mark Roberts, Mark Roberts and Mark Roberts
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelly et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Clinton Kelly and Julie Kelly
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and BJ Services Co USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Reher v. Savage Transportation Management Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00077
Plaintiff:
Charles A Reher and Charles A Reher
Defendant:
Savage Transportation Management Inc, Canac Industrial Rail Management Inc, FMC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Papa v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv00293
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Papa
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Union Pacific Railroad Company vs NES
as 2:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
NES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Eastman et al
as 2:2007cv00164
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
James M Eastman and Commercial Guaranty Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
