Cases 21 - 30 of 91
NORA et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01382
Plaintiff:
BELEN D. NORA
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
ROSS v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as 3:2012cv01325
Plaintiff:
BETTY JO ROSS
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, INC. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROSS v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01325
Plaintiff:
BETTY JO ROSS
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and others
HULIN v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as 3:2012cv01278
Plaintiff:
VIKKI L. HULIN
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HULIN v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP.
as NJ/3:12-cv-01278
Plaintiff:
VIKKI L. HULIN
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
HUDSON et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01131
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY ATKINSON HUDSON and JOHN R. HUDSON, JR.
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
HUDSON et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2012cv01131
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY ATKINSON HUDSON and JOHN R. HUDSON, JR.
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAWSON v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01112
Plaintiff:
JOAN A. RAWSON
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
SADOWSKI et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as NJ/3:12-cv-01113
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. SADOWSKI and KEN SADOWSKI
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
RAWSON v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. et al
as 3:2012cv01112
Plaintiff:
JOAN A. RAWSON
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP. and WARNER CHILCOTT (US), INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
