Cases 381 - 390 of 441,649
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Elezovic v. MJB Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv04443
Plaintiff:
Eldin Elezovic
Defendant:
MJB Holding Corporation and Impact Real Estate Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Headley-Tomlinson v. Engel Burman Senior Housing at North Hills, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04445
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Headley-Tomlinson
Defendant:
Engel Burman Senior Housing at North Hills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Higgins v. CABS Home Attendants Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04439
Plaintiff:
Alford Higgins
Defendant:
CABS Home Attendants Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodriguez v. Elite Parking Area Maintenance, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04444
Plaintiff:
Dany Yovany Jovel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Elite Parking Area Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roland v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04447
Plaintiff:
Leo P Roland
Defendant:
The City of New York, Sarena Townsend and Ruben Benitez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stoot et al v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06393
Plaintiff:
Robin Stoot and Lisa Phillips
Defendant:
Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Stoot et al v. Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Robin Stoot and Lisa Phillips
Defendant:
Capital Management Services Group, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
