Cases 31 - 40 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06222
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. A. Duie Pyle, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00115
Defendant:
A. Duie Pyle, Inc. and Jamel Forbes
Plaintiff:
Andrew T Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv07044
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01419
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Forbes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06724
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Paris Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Godinger Silver Art, Ltd. v. The Winsford Company LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04109
Plaintiff:
Godinger Silver Art, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Winsford Company LLC, The Winsford Corporation and Forbes Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Forbes et al
as 1:2020cv06890
Defendant:
Illusions Hookah & Mixology Lounge Inc. doing business as Illusions Hookah & Mixology Lounge, Dominic Forbes as an officer, director, shareholder, member and/or principal of Illusions Hookah & Mixology Lounge Inc. d/b/a Illusions Hookah & Mixology Lounge and Dominic Forbes
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
