Cases 31 - 40 of 663
Smith v. Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Zynerba Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Armando Anido, Warren D. Cooper and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Philips v. Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Mary Philips
Defendant:
Magellan Midstream Partners, L.P., Walter R. Arnheim, Lori A. Gobillot and others
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & P Logistics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
M & P Logistics Inc. and Kulwant Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Levi v. Cecere et al
as 1:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Richard Levi
Defendant:
Andrew Cecere, Terry Dolan, Jodi Richard and others
Nominal Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp
Azzawi v. Cannon-Brookes et al
as 1:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Omar Azzawi
Defendant:
Michael Cannon-Brookes, Scott Farquhar, Shona Brown and others
Nominal Defendant:
Atlassian Corporation
Wilhelm v. Conformis, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Conformis, Inc., Kenneth Fallon III, Mark Augusti and others
PFA US Real Estate Medium P/S v. Thor NJ Center of Excellence Investment LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
PFA US Real Estate Medium P/S
Defendant:
Thor NJ Center of Excellence Investment LLC, Thor NJ Center of Excellence GP LLC and Thor NJ Center of Excellence Promote LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Schaper v. Lensar, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schaper and Christopher P. Bolster
Defendant:
Lensar, Inc., Nicholas T. Curtis, Thomas R. Staab, II and others
O'Neill v. IVERIC Bio Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
Adrienne L. Graves, Mark S. Blumenkranz, Pravin U. Dugel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
