Cases 31 - 40 of 106
Steuben County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06107
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Steuben County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Cattaraugus County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06103
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Cattaraugus County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Schoharie County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06123
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Schoharie County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Cayuga County v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06106
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Cayuga County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Town of Amherst, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06118
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Amherst, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Warren County, NY v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv06133
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Assertio Therapeutics, Novartis AG and others
Plaintiff:
Warren County, NY, Westchester County NY and Westchester County, NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC.
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant:
WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court:
FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re:
EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party:
IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff:
Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner:
TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv09244
Plaintiff:
199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health a and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, City of Providence, Rhode Island, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant:
Actavis plc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and American Sales Company, LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Duclau v. Boehringer Ingelheim et al
as 3:2023cv20352
Plaintiff:
Robert Duclau
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim, DSM Pharmaceuticals Inc., GlaxoSmithKline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015cv03278
Plaintiff:
American Sales Company, LLC, Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
