Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cheri et al v. Deja Vu - Colorado Springs, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02446
Defendant:
Pine Tree Assets, Inc., Deja Vu Services, Inc., Deja Vu - Colorado Springs, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Julianne Klaren, Ana Cheri and Kristina Chai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pacheco v. Remers et al
as 1:2018cv02387
Defendant:
Dat Truong, Ana Munoz, Samantha Remers and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longoria v. Million Dollar Corporation
as 1:2018cv02266
Plaintiff:
Jaime Longoria, Rosie Roff, Emily Sears and others
Defendant:
Million Dollar Corporation and Million Dollar Corporation doing business as Dandy Dan's Gentlemen's Club doing business as Dandy Dan's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Castro et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01278
Plaintiff:
Don Medaris, Mittie Flournoy, Tina Sheeks and others
Defendant:
Kidde-Fenwal, Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rasmussen v. Rodriguez Castorena
as 1:2018cv01087
Plaintiff:
Drew Rasmussen
Defendant:
Ana Rodriguez Castorena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crespo-Gutierrez v. Resendiz Ramirez
as 1:2016cv01028
Plaintiff:
Axel Crespo-Gutierrez
Defendant:
Ana Maria Resendiz Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1231 (a)(6) - Immigration: Due Process Clause
Clouser et al v. Sierra Nevada Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv02197
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clouser and Ana Clouser
Defendant:
Sierra Nevada Corporation and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
