Cases 31 - 40 of 366
POTAT v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67738
Plaintiff:
JOHN POTAT
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67625
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Johnson
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEDOW v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67743
Plaintiff:
MARIE C WEDOW
Defendant:
AC AND S INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMARILLO v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67685
Plaintiff:
DOMINGO CAMARILLO
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAIN v. A&M INSULATION COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv67734
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CAIN
Defendant:
A&M INSULATION COMPANY, AC AND S INC , AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67639
Plaintiff:
EDDIE W THOMAS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , A&M INSULATION CO , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67714
Plaintiff:
LEON MACK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKER v. A&M INSULATION COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv67735
Plaintiff:
ROBERT P BROOKER
Defendant:
A&M INSULATION COMPANY, AC AND S INC , AW CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AYALA v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67631
Plaintiff:
IGNATIUS AYALA
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , A&M INSULATION CO , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO et al
as 2:2009cv92262
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JONES
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
