Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Soymet 101 LLC
as 2:2014cv02181
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Soymet 101 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company v. Craig's Concrete Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02285
Plaintiff:
West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Craig's Concrete Inc and Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
as 2:2013cv02279
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Andritz Inc.
as 2:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Andritz Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Kirk v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
as 1:2013cv00672
Defendant:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael J Kirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Askra Maritime Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland
as 2:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Askra Maritime Co. Ltd.
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland and ADM International SARL
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Archer Daniels Midland Company et al v. Paillardon
as 2:2012cv02227
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company and ADM Latin America Inc
Defendant:
Regis Paillardon
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Dynasty Shipholding Corp v. Allied Maritime Inc
as 2:2012cv02096
Plaintiff:
Dynasty Shipholding Corp
Defendant:
Allied Maritime Inc
Garnishee:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Spar Shipping AS v. Allied Maritime Inc.
as 2:2012cv02088
Plaintiff:
Spar Shipping AS
Defendant:
Allied Maritime Inc
Garnishee:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
