Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Douglas et al v. The Brand Banking Company et al
as 1:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Andre Douglas, McDaniel Mill JZ, LLC, Koman Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
The Brand Banking Company, BB&T Bank, EBank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson et al v. BB&T Mortgage
as 1:2010cv01234
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson and Verdell Wilson
Defendant:
BB&T Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Benner v. BB&T Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael Benner
Defendant:
BB&T Insurance Services, Inc.
First Service Mortgage, Inc. et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 1:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
First Service Mortgage, Inc., Purnell Properties, LLC, Tony Bryant and others
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Branch Banking and Trust Company, BB&T Bankcard Corporation and others
Mcree v. BB&T Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv03595
Plaintiff:
Kaye Mcree
Defendant:
BB&T Corporation and Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.
Mayers v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 1:2009cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mayers
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, BB & T Corporation and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Mayers v. Branch Banking and Trust Company et al
as 1:2009mi00529
Plaintiff:
Gregory Mayers
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, BB & T Corporation and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type:
Other Statutes
Yarbrough v. BB&T Insurance Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00563
Plaintiff:
Robert Yarbrough
Defendant:
BB&T Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
