Cases 31 - 40 of 60
LIEBERMAN v. BARCLAYS BANK PLC
as 3:2018cv02339
Plaintiff:
ADAM LIEBERMAN
Defendant:
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CLARITY WATER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. BARCLAY WATER MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2018cv01899
Defendant:
BARCLAY WATER MANAGEMENT, INC. , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Plaintiff:
CLARITY WATER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and TODD BROSAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al v. VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM , THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE PENSION FUND , THE BOARD OF EDUCATION RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant:
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. , J. MICHAEL PEARSON , HOWARD B SCHILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHAUDHRY v. BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06295
Plaintiff:
AHMED CHAUDHRY
Defendant:
BLUE APRON HOLDINGS, INC. , MATTHEW B. SALZBERG , BRADLEY J. DICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
ROTKIN v. BARCLAYS CARD SERVICES
as 3:2017cv03507
Plaintiff:
OSHER ROTKIN
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CARD SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BOGART v. BARCLAYS CARD SERVICES
as 3:2017cv03297
Plaintiff:
ALAN BOGART
Defendant:
BARCLAYS CARD SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEUWIRTH v. JET BLUE REWARDS (BARCLAYS)
as 3:2017cv02231
Plaintiff:
ROBERT NEUWIRTH
Defendant:
JET BLUE REWARDS (BARCLAYS)
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
