Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Ho v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2014cv04255
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In Re Canon Inkjet Printer Litigation
as 2:2014cv03235
Plaintiff:
Sarah Barrett and Melanie Clark
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Marcus Ho and Michael Robertson
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Canon U.S.A., Inc., v. Uziel et al
as 1:2013cv05881
Defendant:
Accessory Den, Inc., Digital Accessories 1 Corp., Saveon Digital, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Canon U.S.A., Inc., v. Assoulin
as 1:2013cv04816
Defendant:
Louis Assoulin
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Merizon Group Incorporated et al v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02744
Defendant:
Canon Business Solutions, Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merizon Group Incorporated and R.K. Dixon Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Canon U.S.A., Inc. v. Wang
as 1:2011cv05287
Plaintiff:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Lei Wang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Glory Licensing LLC v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2011cv03058
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Glory Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01948
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Millennium, L.P. v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2011cv01440
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Millennium, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Canon Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03867
Petitioner:
Omron Corporation
Plaintiff:
Image Processing Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Canon Inc. and Canon U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
