Cases 31 - 40 of 58
FALONI & ASSOCIATES, LLC v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 2:2019cv09494
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A., CITIMORTGAGE and CITIFINANCIAL
Plaintiff:
FALONI & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv16192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KAYA v. CITIBANK, N.A et al
as 2:2018cv02709
Plaintiff:
AYLIN KAYA
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A., SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.76 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.65 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-28-8 et al
as 3:2018cv01802
Plaintiff:
PENNEAST PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR 0.76 ACRES AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR 0.65 ACRES IN WEST AMWELL TOWNSHIP, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TAX PARCEL NO. 1026-28-8, THOMAS CEKORIC, JR., PEGGY CEKORIC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
OVADIA v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 3:2017cv05044
Plaintiff:
MIKE OVADIA
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
WEINBERGER v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 3:2017cv05043
Plaintiff:
TZIPPA WEINBERGER
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
ROTKIN v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 3:2017cv03510
Plaintiff:
OSHER ROTKIN
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
