Cases 31 - 40 of 3,850
LaManna v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Leslie LaManna
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Harmon v. Simpers et al
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Harmon
Defendant:
Luke A. Simpers and National Railroad Passengers Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Earin AB v. Sennheiser Electronic Corporation
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Earin AB
Defendant:
Sennheiser Electronic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Intersect Technologies, LLC v. Driven IQ Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Intersect Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Driven IQ Corporation and Albert Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dropkin v. Blair et al
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Matt McGrew, Emmanuel Ligner and others
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jones
Defendant:
Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC v. Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Defendant:
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc., Alliance Data Systems Corporation, Joseph L. Motes III and others
Plaintiff:
Pirinate Consulting Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
Gamehancement LLC v. Verance Corporation
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Gamehancement LLC
Defendant:
Verance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rounds v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
David Rounds
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
