Cases filed in Texas
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,557
Hertenstein v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv00043
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Ellen Marie Hertenstein
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Lariviere v. Colvin
as 4:2017mc00198
Plaintiff: Joseph Lariviere
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gallegos v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00201
Plaintiff: Sylvia Gallegos
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
O'Connor v. Colvin
as 5:2017cv00041
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Nora F. Lagrone O'Connor
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodwin v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00202
Plaintiff: Beverly R. Goodwin
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bradshaw v. Colvin
as 4:2017mc00182
Plaintiff: Tina M. Bradshaw
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Carson v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00199
Plaintiff: Mary Beth Carson
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ungaro v. Colvin
as 4:2017cv00198
Plaintiff: Lorie Ann Ungaro
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Schaker v. Colvin
as 5:2017cv00030
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Frederick Onofer Schaker, III
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2017cv00027
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Herlinda Martinez
Notice Only Party: Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?