Cases 31 - 40 of 1,230
Smith v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Jones v. Avid Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Avid Technology, Inc., John P. Wallace, Christian A. Asmar and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24418
Plaintiff:
ADAM DALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10384
Plaintiff:
HEATH DALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11236
Plaintiff:
BERNARD A DALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07831
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07347
Plaintiff:
CHAZ DALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
