Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Ward v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2018cv00509
Defendant:
ISCI, All Succeeding (& Responsible) Officer(s), Agent(s), and Appointed/Contracted Subsidiaries, Corizon and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2018cv00507
Defendant:
ISCI, A D Shedd, Unknown Individuals and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Jones Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pony Jackson v. Terema Carlin
as 17-35981
Petitioner - Appellant:
PONY LEO JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TEREMA CARLIN, Warden ISCI
David Dalrymple v. Keith Yordy, et al
as 17-35503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ALLEN DALRYMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Warden, LEROY PENEKU, Assistant Warden and GREENLAND, Lt, c/o ISCI
Mansell v. IDOC et al
as 1:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
IDOC, ISCI and Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Wood v. Keith Yordy, et al
as 12-35336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE CONWAY WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH YORDY, Ex-Deputy Warden at Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI), STEVE NELSON, Ex-Deputy Warden at ISCI, JAY CHRISTENSEN, Deputy Warden at ISCI and others
Veenstra v. Blades et al
as 1:2011cv00632
Petitioner:
Albert Pete Veenstra, III
Respondent:
Johanna Smith and ISCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Wolfe v. Johanna Smith
as 11-35229
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM WOLFE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHANNA SMITH, Warden, ISCI
Smrz v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv00561
Petitioner:
Patrick Edward Smrz
Respondent:
Johanna Smith, ISCI and Michael McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
