Cases 31 - 40 of 2,025
HOLDEN v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv03596
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY and SUSAN TSUI GRUNDMANN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MURPHY v. WORMUTH
as 1:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
JAMES F MURPHY
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAMES MADISON PROJECT et al v. OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
as 1:2023cv03457
Plaintiff:
JAMES MADISON PROJECT and BRIAN J. KAREM
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BREEZEE et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03392
Plaintiff:
JASON M BREEZEE, KYLE M. BUMP, CHRISTOPHER L. BURNHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
