Cases 31 - 40 of 96
CITY OF BANGOR v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BANGOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CITY OF PORTLAND v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 2:2018cv00282
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA LP and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PORTLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PISCITELLI v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC et al
as 2:2017cv00333
Plaintiff:
MARK M PISCITELLI
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DINSMORE v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00318
Plaintiff:
SUK CHA DINSMORE
Defendant:
JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DERHAK v. ETHICON INC et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH DERHAK
Defendant:
ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 2:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY PRODUCTS INC, DEPUY SYNTHES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BILLINGS v. ETHICON INC et al
as 2:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
AMIE BILLINGS
Defendant:
ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FURLONG v. ETHICON INC et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
IRENE FURLONG
Defendant:
ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAVAGE v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al
as 2:2016cv00604
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SAVAGE
Defendant:
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC, DEPUY PRODUCTS INC, DEPUY SYNTHES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARPENTER v. ETHICON INC et al
as 2:2016cv00367
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CARPENTER
Defendant:
ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
