Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Jonnson et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv06234
Defendant:
James L. Dennis, Patrick E, Higginbotham, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Keith Hill and Zachary Jonnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jolly Trading LTD v. National Fashions Imports Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04620
Defendant:
John Doe 1-100, Senior Klein, Simon Klein and others
Plaintiff:
Jolly Trading LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Holman v. Wooten et al
as 1:2011mc00185
Defendant:
Cindy Lee Brunink/Brunink, Clemson University, Allyson K. Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Holman
Barnes v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2010cv06164
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Maggie Brooks, Patrick M. O'Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swepson v. The Jolly Tinker, Inc.
as 1:2009cv07464
Plaintiff:
Carlos Swepson and Carlos Swepson
Defendant:
The Jolly Tinker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hepworth et al v. The Jolly Tinker, Inc.
as 1:2009cv07463
Plaintiff:
Brian Hepworth, Brian Hepworth, Joseph Tenney and others
Defendant:
The Jolly Tinker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jolly v. Kirkpatrick et al
as 6:2009cv06429
Plaintiff:
Paul Jolly
Defendant:
Robert Kirkpatrick, Monahan, Martain Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Wachovia Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv05324
Plaintiff:
Todd A Wright
Defendant:
Wachovia Corp., John D. Baker, II, Peter C. Browning and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oates v. Darwin et al
as 7:2007cv11551
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Oates
Defendant:
David L. Darwin, David Jolly and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oates v. Darwin et al
as 1:2007cv11551
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Oates
Defendant:
David L. Darwin and David Jolly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
