Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00180
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00983
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Pirkkala et al
as 1:2009cv22495
Plaintiff:
Jose Baleriano Gonzalez
Defendant:
Steve Pirkkala, J C Garcia, Loren G Grayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carter v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2009cv00272
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Marquise Carter
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana, Dr. Onugha, Kim Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cortinas v. Pastrana et al
as 1:2008cv22058
Petitioner:
Enrique Cortinas
Respondent:
Jorge L. Pastrana, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Canword v. Pastrana
as 0:2008cv61099
Petitioner:
Ricardo Canword
Respondent:
Jorge L. Pastrana
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lenoir v. Pastrana et al
as 1:2008cv21556
Petitioner:
James E. Lenoir
Respondent:
Jorge L. Pastrana and Federal Bureau Of Prisons,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv20650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Pastrana et al
as 1:2008cv20797
Plaintiff:
Richard Goodman
Defendant:
Jorge L. Pastrana and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
William Pou v. Jorge L. Pastrana
as 1:2008cv20774
Petitioner:
William Pou
Respondent:
Jorge L. Pastrana, Jorge L. Pastrana and Jorge L. Pastrana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
