Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Aitchison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
Richard Aitchison Aitchison, Miranda Anderson, Paul Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hinkley et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Brian Hinkley, Lori Humble, Alva John and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Andres et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
January Andres, Simao Anton, Steven Brittain and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kent v. Neenah, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Neenah, Inc., Shruti Singhal, Tony R. Thene and others
Sanders v. The Delaware Supreme Court et al
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Sanders
Defendant:
The Delaware Supreme Court, The Department of Correction and The Superior Court, Kent County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Willis v. Smyrna Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
DeAndre L. Willis
Defendant:
Smyrna Police Department, Kent County, Prosecutor Erik C. Towne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Jarvis
Defendant:
Warden Robert May, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis, Captain Bruce Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. McAfee Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
McAfee Corp., Jon Winkelried, Kathy Willard and others
Kent v. Rogers Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01806
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Rogers Corporation, Keith L. Barnes, Megan Faust and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
