Cases 31 - 40 of 3,123
ELLIS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86561
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ELLIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HALL, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86574
Plaintiff:
THURMAN RICHARD HALL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HENSON, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN HENSON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MURDOCK v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv08338
Plaintiff:
GLENN MURDOCK
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BRANNON, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86536
Plaintiff:
GAITHER WAYNE BRANNON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SICONOLFI v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86368
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., IMO INDUSTRIES, AVENTIS CROPSCIENCE USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEMETRIOUS SICONOLFI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86344
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., VIACOM, INC., BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC. and others
Plaintiff:
AUBREY G. MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86552
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SAMUEL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FERRELL, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86562
Plaintiff:
RONNIE KNOX FERRELL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CANNON, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86540
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEVON CANNON
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
