Cases 31 - 40 of 147
MEIER v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2022cv02052
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
Plaintiff:
DORIS MEIER
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LI v. MJS OF MATAWAN LLC et al
as 3:2021cv20578
Plaintiff:
MIN LI
Defendant:
MJS OF MATAWAN LLC, VILLAGE FALLS LLC, ANGELO DICAPUA and others
ETHRIDGE v. KRZANICH et al
as 2:2022cv02302
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., BRIAN M KRZANICH, SHAUNA MCINTYRE and others
Plaintiff:
DUANE P. ETHRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
In Re:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
LI v. ZHANG et al
as 3:2022cv00891
Plaintiff:
XUEHAI LI
Defendant:
YUN ZHANG, BENTON BLAKE CAMPER, Jr., CARI CAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
LI v. LIQUID WEB INC.
as 1:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
ZHI MING LI
Defendant:
LIQUID WEB INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
YEOMAN et al v. XU et al
as 2:2022cv00410
Defendant:
HELEN ZHANG, XIAOYANG XU, NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Plaintiff:
ROY R. YEOMAN, III and NANODERM SCIENCES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
